The Signal #19
Is the study of polity being reborn?
Last week, the director of Sciences Po argued in an op-ed that Europe needs more than defence capabilities or industrial capacity to navigate an increasingly unstable world. It also needs concepts, analytical frameworks, and civilian researchers capable of informing democratic debate.
His observation reflects a broader shift. Today’s challenges no longer fit comfortably within traditional academic or policy boundaries. Economic policy has become inseparable from national security, whilst technological innovation shapes geopolitical influence and domestic policy increasingly determines foreign policy.
The disciplines through which we have traditionally understood public affairs are beginning to converge as problems increasingly themselves are.
The contemporary model, where universities, governments and think tanks have organised expertise into increasingly specialised fields, has generated enormous advances in knowledge, but it also reflected a world in which policy domains were treated as relatively distinct. Security specialists studied defence, while economists studied markets. Political scientists examined institutions, and innovation experts focused on technology. Today’s governance challenges cut across all of these.
Artificial intelligence is simultaneously a science and technology issue, labour market issue, an engineering issue, a national security issue, an industrial policy issue, a democratic governance issue and a public administration issue. Energy policy is climate policy, industrial policy and geopolitical strategy at the same time. Biotechnology raises questions of health, security, ethics and international competition in equal measure.
The intellectual architecture inherited from the twentieth century is increasingly being asked to explain twenty-first-century systems. This matters because ideas shape institutions long before institutions shape outcomes.
As Europe debates strategic autonomy, economic security and democratic resilience, it is also confronting a more foundational challenge: whether it possesses the conceptual tools to govern this new reality. Investments in research, defence or industrial capacity matter enormously, but they depend on frameworks that help societies understand problems, evaluate trade-offs and make collective choices.
The ability to govern complexity is itself becoming a strategic capability. That suggests an important evolution in the study of polity.
Rather than treating governance as the sum of separate policy domains, polity can be understood as the study of how societies organise collective action across interconnected systems. It asks not only what individual policies achieve but how institutions define purpose, distribute power, shape incentives, include different voices and navigate unavoidable trade-offs.
As policy domains converge, these underlying questions become more important. The future of governance scholarship may therefore need to move beyond producing narrow expertise to developing the capacity to connect disciplines without sacrificing analytical rigour.
That is a far harder intellectual task than further specialisation. But as the problems societies face become increasingly interconnected, the ability to integrate knowledge may become as strategically important as the ability to produce it.
The future of polity studies may therefore lie not in replacing existing disciplines, but in building the intellectual bridges between them. Those bridges may prove just as important as the knowledge they connect.
—
Keep contemplating,
Sanja
